When to let go of organizational goals

markus-winkler-LNzuOK1GxRU-unsplash (1)Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash

Goals. They are a cornerstone of organizational and performance management. Searching “goal” in Harvard Business Reviews search bar brings up 24,156 search results (as of Sep 1, 2020).  For leaders managing organizations, goals range from revenue, growth and expense goals to operational and customer goals. For employees, they are important motivators and markers of success. Irrespective – goal setting is a both a time of reflection and anxiety for managers and employees alike.

But what happens when a goal is no longer relevant? What if the purpose for the goal no longer exists or changes so drastically? If there’s ever been a time to rethink goals, it’s now. With markets behaving in unprecedented ways, organizations and their teams should be taking a step back to revisit pre-pandemic aspirations. The elephant in the room when doing so is …. does it still matter?

There has never been a better time to flex those agility and pivot muscles and to rethink your goals and approach to the future. Here are 4 steps on your reset journey.

  1. Clean your mental slate. Assume the goals you have today no longer exist (even if temporarily). In doing this, also clear out assumptions you’ve long held in the past about how markets and people work. This will be the most difficult task and will be one you have to come back to time and again.
  2. Study the market and your customers. It can be hard to lift attention away from your company’s performance and focus on external factors – but this is a critical first step. The world came to a near stop in March 2020 for many industries in North America and while some are recovering. Look beyond your current customer base at adjacent opportunities. Understand the market dynamics of the supply chain and activity beyond your current product offering. Derive insights based on market dynamics and people’s behaviours and habits.
  3. Make new hypotheses that impact your business. With a clean slate and insights, develop new and relevant hypotheses about your business and the role it plays in the market and customers. These hypotheses should form a rich narrative that is conscious of residual assumptions. During this exercise, go back to step one and ensure your hypotheses are grounded in new insight driving to the future vs. past experience only.  Take your time doing this – and continually ask yourself. What is this hypothesis grounded in – the past or the future?  Here’s one: “More people will work from home indefinitely, even after the pandemic, which will impact companies supporting commute travel and core commercial areas”. And another: “Borders are closed so we will have few newcomers to the country”. Both are testable and impact numerous industries.
  4. Stress test goals. Assume the hypotheses you’ve developed turn out to be true – develop new goals to meet your business objectives with these truths in place. Is the customer target you were aiming for last year still believable? Should you continue to pour marketing dollars into a channels that aren’t productive? If the answer is no, then it’s probably time for your organization and team to focus on new goals.

Once you’re clear on letting goal of your goals, there are three hard tasks to follow. The first is developing a set of new aspirational goals for your teams. The second is communicating the pivots and changes effectively to your leadership and their teams. The third is ensuring individual goals line up to these organizational ones. Even with companies that are well oiled machines, this can be a difficult task that can lead to confusion. Ensure that you have an engaging “why” narrative, a concise “what” strategy and a clear “how” plan cascaded at each level.

While these activities are not to be taken lightly – clearing the deck of  goals that are no longer relevant can free you and your teams to focus on what truly matters.

 

Why organizations spin

In my experience, most people have the best of intentions at work. They see problems at work and want to solve them.  They create strategies, work plans and activities to try to fix the problem within their specific context.  While they get an A for effort, the reality is they may do more harm than good. Why?

  • Organizations are systems. The problem is that most issues are connected to other parts of the mothership. When a process breaks down in one area, trying to fix that area on its own could be a short term solve, but it could break or slow things down in other areas. A classic example is optimization of a single task – say call centre. We want to decrease the time on call at help desk. We may try to fix that by passing them off to another group or by speeding up the solve on the phone. But if we try to fix the system, we create resources so the call doesn’t happen in the first place.
  • People want to feel like they’re making a difference. They hear of an issue and set about trying to fix it without communicating or asking if other people are working on it. They forge ahead but often don’t know what they don’t know. This leads to …
  • Many programs, one goal. The number of projects and programs spun up to tackle and organizational priority can be astounding. It’s so rampant in large companies there are often additional projects to gather the activities so they are aligned. If I had to guess, any one organization has a multitude of innovation, onboarding, data projects, new customer etc. underway trying to solve the same or similar problems.

The result is wasted effort and, more importantly, time that could have been spent driving a new product forward, or on other valuable company projects. So how do we get beyond the spin? Organizations need to:

  • Declare – at the top of the house the strategy, workstreams and how is leading
  • Define – the activities for each workstream and who is leading
  • Drive – move with speed so people see results and don’t spin up more work

Purpose. Clarity. Speed. Seems easy, but we all know it’s not. With a leadership team open to exploring, talent that is keen, smart, creative and passionate and a dose of structure, you’re that much closer to solving the things that are important for your organization.

How to define what’s important to your organization

In the world of organizational strategy,  brand and employee experience, companies trying to figure out who they are can be an infinite loop. Between strategy, vision, mission, purpose, values, principles, culture, models and many more,  where does a leader even begin? Let’s start with definitions  (Source: adapted from Google).

  • Strategy: a plan of action or policy designed to achieve a major or overall aim
  • Mission: a strongly felt aim, ambition, or calling
  • Vision: the ability to think about or plan the future with imagination or wisdom
  • Purpose: the reason for which something is done, created or for which it exists
  • Principles: a fundamental attribute determining the nature of something; an essence
  • Values: principles or standards of behaviour;  judgment of what is important in life
  • Culture: the customs, arts, social institutions, and achievements of a group
  • Model: a system or thing used as an example to follow or imitate

Looking at this list, a picture of a Venn diagram is beginning to emerge where Purpose overlaps with Mission, Strategy with Vision, Principles with Values (it has the world principles in it for crying out loud). And culture – well culture is just a part of everything so it’s the ultimate container. So – why do organizations feel like they need to check all the boxes and create bodies of work behind each of these? The answer is – they don’t and shouldn’t.

As we define the companies we build and lead, we need focus on what matters – the core and content in how we deliver on how we show up day to day. Let’s get back to the fundamentals of  Why (Purpose / Mission), What (Strategy  / Vision) and How (Culture / Values / Principles). Use whatever label you like,  but keep it to 3 and have each one clearly defined so they can be easily communicated and delivered.

Personally like using Purpose, Strategy and Culture to describe the big O (overall organization) and principles to get to specificity.

The value of understanding value

I recently read a post – Hypothetical Value and Real Value by Fred Wilson, partner at USV. It was thought provoking – not only its comparison of tangible and yet-to-be-tangible business scenarios – but also in its potential application to other areas;

  • how we spend our time
  • the choices we make in prioritizing business activities
  • where we put our personal investments
  • decisions we make with raising our kids

It’s often difficult to know for sure where the best bets are placed, what you should invest in (time, money, effort). The “sure bet, no regrets” are often the baby steps in choosing where to put resources, but at one point you’ve got to make a decision on a direction. The balance between real and hypothetical value can help to bring perspective to that decision:

  • what are we actually valuing?
  • what are the trade offs?
  • what’s the risk/ reward profile
  • value today vs. tomorrow

I find it helpful to understand how thinkers and doers from a variety of disciplines approach decision making. Let’s use time as the example. If I were thinking about the “real value” of time, it’s in the direct trade off to some tangible value – work for pay, exercise for endorphins, tutoring a child. The “hypothetical value” of time is a future state bet – the things we can’t see today. Some of the actions may be the same – exercise leads to better health, lower healthcare costs in the future, greater longevity. Building skills which may not be as visible today and are a lot of work could yield tremendous benefit in the future. Spending time with a child to nurture brings joy (or not) in the short term, but a supported child returns 10x in their future life experiences.

How do you think about your investment decisions? Food for thought.

 

Flip the switch

I’ve been obsessed this summer with the idea of flips. A flip is the moment when the intent and context of something changes to have the opposite impact.

The idea first started with the new red dice in the game of Monopoly. They call it the speed dice which helps move what could be a many hours game along. The premise is you can roll the dice and it gives you a series of move options. If you roll Mr. Monopoly, you get to move the number spaces rolled on the other two die AND THEN move to the next available property. Once all the properties are purchased, rolling Mr. Monopoly then sends you to the first property NOT owned by you so you have to pay rent.

This rule is actually quite a startling metaphor for many things in our lives. For the entire first part of the game, you want to role Mr. Monopoly to accumulate more properties. Then, somewhere along the game, once all the properties are gone, it’s value completely changes from creation to destruction. You now need to pay on the property you land on that’s not yours.

There are so many analogous situations in life.

  • Spend your entire life saving and contributing to a retirement savings plan, but once you hit a certain age or if you have to start taking it out, you get hit with tax bills if you didn’t understand there were penalties for saving so much.
  • Start Ups are another great example. Operating models that work when they’re small, will hurt them when they grow. Changing the ways in which work is done and valued is critical.
  • ….

There are many other examples of flips. More to come on this topic.

The power of streaks

Streaks are an extremely powerful motivational tool that act as a positive flywheel to achieving your goals. Streaks are typically a continued set of daily actions with a specific goal. Examples of streaks from wildly different applications:

  • Snapchat streaks – when you send direct snaps back and forth with a friend for several consecutive days
  • Pokemon Go catch streaks – when you catch Pokemon for several consecutive days
  • FitBit active days – when you reach your step / activity goal daily
  • Starbucks challenges – some challenges require purchase / try a new product for several consecutive days
  • Streaks – there’s even an app that helps you form habits!

This gamified mechanism is powerful for a number of reasons:

  • They’re habit forming. The longer you do the same thing, the more your brain and or body become familiar with the action(s).
  • Streaking is self strengthening and highly addictive – every day you successfully complete a streak, seeing the progress motivates you for tomorrow.
  • The positive momentum of streaks taps into loss aversion theory – once you are on a roll, you don’t want to stop for fear of ending your success

I personally love streaks and it’s an extremely powerful tool.
I’ve used streaks in the past to:

  • Track daily exercise / walks
  • Cut something out of my diet – caffeine and booze
  • Write daily
  • ….and many others

These were all successful while the streak was going. That said, once you miss a day, it is very easy to fall back to old habits. That’s the downfall of streaks – there is no mechanism to continue the motivation once an activity is stopped which has a rebound effect.

What do you think about streaks?

Do you need to restructure your org?

Organizations are entrenched in their habits and routines. When these become sub optimal and structures need to pivot, how do leaders know when, what and how? Too often, restructures don’t result in their intended benefits – masking issues by moving pieces on the board around, without putting the work in to uncover root causes underlying why restructures occur in the first place. But delaying changes can cause high performing teams to lose momentum and languish. Consider the following when planning for restructures.


Key indicators of when.

There’s no signal that lights up that says “Restructure Now!”. The balance in any scenario is to remove the barriers and issues that keep high performing teams from achieving objectives without losing the things that are working well. Some signals that your organization is ready for a restructure include:

  • Existing structure doesn’t optimally support the current context of the organization
  • Deep dive into root causes cannot be addressed in the current structure
  • There is overwhelming consensus across leadership that a restructure is needed

What to restructure.

Many aspects of an organization are involved in a restructure. Organizational processes and structure, grounded in foundations.

  1. Starting with foundations, leadership needs to align to purpose, mission, vision and strategy. Without this core, any restructure will fail as leaders will operate off their own playbook – leading to mixed messages and spin.
  2. Determining the appropriate org structure is critical once there is alignment at the foundational level. How are teams organized to deliver on the strategy? Who are leaders for the teams? What are their roles and responsibilities? Clearly defined decision rights are key to both structure and process.
  3. Building the right processes to deliver within the org structure includes developing the routines of teams, how they communicate and are accountable to the organization and each other. To be successful, processes need to be grounded in the values of the organization and defined by a set of design principles that help to guide, not overly govern behaviour.

How to actually do the damn thing. 

This one is entirely dependent on the context of the organization. Restructures need to be handled with care as they impact at the intersection of human ambition and need for safety and security. Answering key questions when thinking about how will help to inform the how. Consider the following:

PEOPLE

  • How fragile are teams in the current state?
  • Are teams asking for change?

STRUCTURE

  • What is the organization’s readiness for restructure?
  • How severe is the anticipated impact?

 TIMING

  • How urgent is change needed?
  • What is the history of restructures and reactions?

There isn’t just one way to think about changing an organization. What’s important is to have a deep understanding of the rationale, context and ultimately, the people within your organization. Any change will have unintended consequences but the risk of status quo when the organization is calling for change is worse. Leaders need to take great care in not just thinking, but planning a thoughtful approach to changing their organizations. Ultimately, they and their teams will need to live the new world they create.